Don't Second-Guess Yourself After Submitting Your MBA Applications
- Shaifali Aggarwal
- Jan 7, 2021
- 7 min read
Updated: May 10

Updated April 2026
Submitting your MBA applications is a significant milestone – and once they're in, the most productive thing you can do is let them go. Second-guessing what you wrote, worrying about a possible typo, or replaying every decision is a natural impulse – but an unproductive one. Here's how to think about the waiting period with more confidence and perspective.
Submitting your MBA applications is a significant accomplishment – one that required months of sustained effort, honest reflection, and more late nights than you probably anticipated. And then you hit submit, close the laptop, and the second-guessing begins.
It's remarkably consistent. Candidates who have worked hard and submitted thoughtfully almost immediately start revisiting what they wrote, worrying about what they might have missed, and replaying decisions they can no longer change. I see it every cycle, with nearly every candidate I work with. It's understandable – and it's worth addressing directly.
You've given it your best shot
If you approached your applications with genuine effort – if you thought carefully about your story, revised your essays through multiple drafts, researched each program seriously, and submitted something that reflects your honest best – then you've done what you were supposed to do. The outcome is no longer within your control. What was within your control was the quality and sincerity of what you submitted, and you exercised that control.
The second-guessing that arrives after submission almost always focuses on things that were marginal at best: a sentence that could have been phrased slightly differently, an example that might have been stronger, a detail that was left out. Those concerns feel significant in the anxious quiet after submission. They almost never were. The applications that succeed or fail don't do so on the basis of minor differences in phrasing or example selection. They do so on the basis of whether the full candidacy – the story, the goals, the evidence of character and capability – came through clearly and compellingly. If you did that work honestly, you've done what matters.
Be kind to yourself about this. You've invested a significant part of yourself in something genuinely important. That deserves acknowledgment – not immediate second-guessing.
What's submitted Is submitted
Once you've hit submit, the application is out of your hands – literally. Business schools don't allow candidates to resubmit materials or make changes after the deadline. There is no mechanism for updating an essay, correcting a sentence, or adding something you forgot. The application that was submitted is the application that will be read.
This finality is actually freeing, if you let it be. There is nothing productive to be gained from reviewing what you submitted and cataloguing its imperfections. The only effect of that exercise is anxiety – and anxiety about something you cannot change is not just unpleasant, it's genuinely useless.
On the typo question specifically: I've seen candidates receive interview invitations and admission offers despite a typo or minor grammatical error in their application. Admissions Committees are evaluating the entire candidate – the full body of evidence across every component. A minor error in one sentence of one essay is not the thing that determines your outcome. What determines your outcome is whether your candidacy – your story, your post-MBA goals, your evidence of leadership and character – was compelling. If it was, a small error won't undo it. If it wasn't, a perfect error-free application wouldn't have saved it.
Let what's submitted be submitted. It's done.
Worrying produces nothing – redirecting does
There's a quote I share with candidates in this moment: "Worrying is like a rocking chair – it gives you something to do, but it gets you nowhere."
The post-submission period has a specific temptation: to fill the uncertainty of waiting with the activity of worrying. It feels like doing something. It isn't. Worrying about what you submitted doesn't improve it, doesn't change what the Admissions Committee will think of it, and doesn't make the decision come faster. All it does is consume energy that could be directed somewhere more useful.
Redirect. Not toward more MBA-related anxiety – toward the things that restore you and keep you grounded. The activities you enjoy that got deprioritized during application season. The relationships you want to reinvest in. The professional work that deserves your full attention. Genuine engagement with anything other than the submitted applications is more productive than the most thorough post-submission review you could conduct.
What to actually do during the waiting period
The waiting period between submission and decisions isn't just dead time – there are useful things to do with it, and doing them well serves your candidacy and your well-being simultaneously.
If you have interviews coming – either because you've received invitations or because you expect them – this is the time to prepare. Interview preparation is meaningful work that directly affects your outcome at schools you've applied to. It's also a productive way to re-engage with your story and your goals in a mode that's forward-looking rather than retrospective.
If you have remaining applications still in progress, focus on them. Every application still ahead of you is an opportunity – and the quality of attention you bring to it matters. Don't let anxiety about submitted applications deplete the energy you need for the ones still in your control.
If your applications are all submitted and interviews aren't yet on the horizon, invest in your professional life. Continue building the profile that the applications represented. The work experience you develop between submission and decision is still part of who you are – and in some cases, meaningful professional developments during this period become relevant if you're deferred to another round or waitlisted and need to update a school on your status.
How to manage the anxiety honestly
The anxiety of the waiting period is real, and it's worth acknowledging it directly rather than trying to wish it away.
You've submitted something important and the outcome is uncertain. That uncertainty is genuinely uncomfortable. Feeling it doesn't mean something is wrong with you – it means you care about something that matters. The candidates who feel nothing during this period are usually the ones who weren't very invested in the outcome.
What helps: staying physically active, maintaining the routines that keep you grounded, staying connected to people you care about, and keeping yourself occupied with meaningful work. What doesn't help: obsessively reading online admissions forums, comparing timelines with other candidates, or repeatedly checking application portals for status changes.
Give yourself permission to feel the uncertainty without letting it run the show. The outcome will arrive when it arrives. Between now and then, your job is to stay grounded, stay engaged in your life, and bring your best self to the things that are still within your control.
Frequently Asked Questions About the Post-Submission Period
How long does it typically take to hear back after submitting?
It varies significantly by school and by round. Most programs release Round 1 decisions in December, Round 2 decisions in March or April, and Round 3 decisions in May. Interview invitations typically come six to eight weeks after the application deadline, though timelines vary. Check each program's published decision timeline on their admissions website for the most accurate expectations. Avoid reading too much into the timing of your specific communication relative to others – schools often release interview invitations in batches, and the sequence doesn't reliably signal anything about the likely outcome.
Is it normal to feel like my application wasn't good enough after submitting?
Completely normal – and almost universally experienced. The post-submission period has a specific quality of doubt that's distinct from the productive doubt that drives revision during the application process. It's the doubt that arrives when you can't do anything about it, which makes it feel more acute than it actually is. The candidates who feel most confident after submitting are often the ones who didn't think hard enough during the process. The ones who second-guess themselves after submitting are often the ones who cared enough to do the work seriously. Don't mistake post-submission anxiety for a signal that your application was inadequate. It's usually just a signal that you're human.
Should I reach out to the admissions office after submitting?
Generally no – unless you have a specific, legitimate reason to do so. Confirming that all materials were received is appropriate if your portal doesn't show a clear complete status. Expressing continued interest or sending unsolicited updates is generally not appropriate and won't help your candidacy. If a school explicitly invites update letters or expressions of continued interest (such as when deferred to another round or when waitlisted), respond to that invitation specifically. Otherwise, let the application stand on its own and resist the impulse to reach out simply because the uncertainty of waiting is uncomfortable.
What if I remember something important I forgot to include?
Unless the omission is significant enough to materially change the picture – and most post-submission omissions aren't – let it go. Submitting supplementary materials that weren't requested is generally not possible or appropriate. If you genuinely believe something was left out that significantly affects your candidacy, contact the admissions office directly and honestly to ask whether there's any mechanism to address it. Most of the time, the thing you forgot was less important than it feels in the anxious aftermath of submission. The applications that work do so because the overall picture was compelling – not because every possible relevant detail was included.
How do I stay focused on remaining applications when I'm anxious about submitted ones?
By making a deliberate mental separation between the two. The submitted applications are done – there's nothing actionable to think about them. The remaining applications are live – they're the ones where your attention and energy can still make a difference. When anxiety about submitted applications surfaces, redirect it to the one specific thing you can do right now on a remaining application. The act of taking a concrete forward step almost always reduces the anxiety about what's behind you, because it brings you back into agency rather than leaving you in the passive state of waiting. Focus on what's still within your control. That's where your attention belongs.
Your story is already there. The work is figuring out how to tell it – clearly, honestly, and in a way that only you could.
If you're in the post-submission waiting period and want support navigating what comes next – I'd love to connect.
You can also explore my MBA admissions consulting services or read Kellogg client success stories.
About the Author
Shaifali Aggarwal is the Founder/CEO of Ivy Groupe and a Harvard MBA and Princeton alumna. Named a top MBA admissions consultant by Business Insider and Poets & Quants, she has helped hundreds of ambitious professionals earn admission to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, M7, and top global MBA programs. She has been quoted as an expert in Business Insider, Fortune, Forbes, Entrepreneur, MarketWatch, US News, and other media outlets, and holds a perfect 5-star rating across all verified client reviews on Poets & Quants.


